Talema AZ-0500 and AZ-1000

A user has sent samples of the Talema AZ series CTs and I’ll be adding these to the IoTaWatt table for the next release. They are very small solid core CTs available from a variety of sources both here in the US (Digikey) and in Europe. I recently measured the AZ-0500 and AZ-1000 for linearity and phase-shift. These are extremely tiny little CTs. The hole is about 7mm. Their turns ratio matches IoTaWatt’s 50ma input range, so all that is needed is to add a lead with a 3.5mm jack and optionally a TVS diode.

Their performance, however, is remarkable only in that they exhibit much more phase shift than any of the previously measured CTs.

The AZ_0500 is rated 25A with a ratio of 500:1. They seem to handle that with no signs of distortion and good linearity with IoTaWatt’s 20 ohm burden. The measured ratio of the two samples tested were 509 & 508 at 60Hz and 511 & 509 at 50Hz. So about 2% off.

The AZ-1000 is rated 50A with a 1000:1 ration. Like the AZ-0500 they showed no signs of distortion. Measured ratio was 1005 for both at 60Hz and 1009 for both at 50Hz.

In my experience with VTs, phase-shift in inversely proportional to weight of the transformer. I’m starting to believe there is a similar relationship with these small, very light CTs. While not a lot different from some decent split-core CTs, these exhibited much greater phase-shift than other solid-cores that I have tested. It should be noted that CTs typically exhibit less shift as the burden is reduced. Many of these small CTs are designed to run with a 10 Ohm or less burden, and here they are tested with the IoTaWatt’s 20 Ohm burden.

image

By comparison, here is the HWCT-004

Not only is the HWCT-004 shift very low, it is fairly flat across the entire range. Shift doesn’t actually cause error, it only introduces it when it’s not sufficiently corrected, and in the case where the VT has a higher shift profile that matches the CT, it can be better to have that higher shift. But what is concerning here is that folks would use the 25A AZ-0500 for small loads because it’s rated to 25A, when actually, the AZ-1000 performs better at low currents, and of course the HWCT-004 (50A CT) performs even better.

I haven’t tested the AZ-0750 yet, but it has the same physical characteristics and my expectation is that it will come in between these two.

Price for these CTs on DigiKey is around $5-$6 in modest quantities. The HWCT-004 on AliExpress is about $2 and $4 from newegg in the US. It’s not much larger and better suited. Here’s a lineup of the HWCT-004, AZ-1000 and Echun ECOL-09 that I used to carry (they were $7 bought with an IoTaWatt including cord, plug, TVS diode and UL/CE listing).

2 Likes

Well but what if size is a constraint ? These are 19mm in width, which is just 1.5mm wider than a typical EU DIN 1 phase breaker (17.5mm). On circuits that might create larger load (max 16A) I’m planning on adding HWCT-004, but something like this or e.g. this YHDC TA12 would be really beneficial for low A lines (led lightning/simple sockets. etc)

1 Like

It’s a tradeoff. That’s the advantage of open source. You have the ability to determine the parameters of alternatives and adapt to them. Without seeing your distribution panel, I can’t comment on the need for CTs that are no greater than the width of the breakers. However, usually the CTs can be staggered to allow ~40% wider CTs and sometimes greater separation can reduce inductive crosstalk.

If that would be the case :slight_smile: Made some mockups of HWCT004 and well I would say it would be difficult to fit more than couple of those cause there is not a lot of space even when trying to stagger those - heigh limitation and other wire proximity.
CT-08CL2 seem to be a bit lower profilfe (13mm vs 9.3mm) so maybe I could stagger those. I could also probably leave some here, move other to the side of the panel were the wire runs, and maybe move some up even more to the outgoing wires. But this gets a bit messy and inconsistent, and I like order in my panel :slight_smile:

YHDC TA12 though align quite nicely (at least on the photos on the internet)

But as you correctly noted - tradeoffs and opensource. The beauty of it. I guess I’ll just order a handfull to try out, see how they actually can be fitted(

You can also put the alternate CTs on the corresponding neutral wires.

1 Like